In a way,
it was a long a “painful” work. Between 1993 and 2000 I wrote three screenplays, two thrillers and a
romantic comedy. The first two were totally unsuitable to Italian cinema and
this thought brought me to write the third one. Not that I actually had any
real hope to see them in an Italian film. Actually I don’t like so much the
Italian cinema. Anyway, when I read again those pages I realise how my style
and my imagination was quite immature at the beginning, but then it improved a
lot.
One day I
wish to make another attempt with that type of writing, even if it still gives
me the feeling I’m wasting my time, because I have no chance that my
screenplays become movies. It isn’t as
“easy” as publishing a book. It isn’t immediately accessible to the final
user. Of course, you can let people read your screenplay, but it doesn’t
provide them with the same effect of a novel.
At that
time I learned most of what I know about this matter on Syd Field’s books. In particular I owned a manual bought on a
catalogue (Internet wasn’t already available in Italy ), “The Screenwriter’s Workbook”, which I read more times and which
explained step by step how to write a screenplay.
One of the
usual manual, you’d say. To tell the truth I found it very useful. I’m not very
interested in reading a manual of this kind about fiction writing, I mean a
step-by-step one, because even if fiction writing has got rules, especially
those related to genre, they are not so strict. They are more like suggestions,
but each of them can be broken. Actually one of the rules is: break some rules.
Screenwriting,
instead, is totally different. You
cannot improvise. You must know well the main rules and you must respect
them, because screenplays have got a more rigid structure.
I don’t
want to go much deep about this matter, because it’s very complex, but what I
want to highlight is that screenplays (and so movies) are made up of three acts. In a nutshell, the first
act (about one fourth of the movie) presents the story, the second act (about
two more fourths of the movie) develops its conflicts and the third act (last
fourth of the movie) brings it to an ending.
Practically
all movies are done like that. And, if you think about it, it’s quite logical.
What about novels?
Well, they
are not obliged to comply with so strict rules, but they often fall into this
structure. Others can diverge and are free to do so. Anyway the 3-act rule
tends to come out, even when you won’t expect it. Sometimes the subdivision isn’t
so rigid, for what concerns the length, but all the same you can often
distinguish three acts.
This
occurred to me while writing my first novel and again when I wrote the
following ones. All of them turned out
to have three acts. Actually even each part of them (sometimes I like to
divide novels in parts) shows this pattern.
Maybe it’s
partly because of me, since I tend to
imagine a story like it’s a movie, but as I can see it is a general rule,
even if you don’t do that intentionally.
What about you? Do you write your stories in
three acts (maybe unintentionally)? Have you ever noticed this structure in the
novels you read?
No comments:
Post a Comment