Flashbacks force the story to appear as we want without changing the facts. |
There are
many way you can develop the timeline
of your story. While in your mind the facts are probably in the correct
chronological order, this may not be the best way to show them to the reader.
Actually what makes a story interesting is not just the plot itself, but most
of all the way it is narrated. It
can happen that stories with a very simple plot become extremely intriguing, if the facts are not showed in a plain
order. On the other hands you can have a long, complex plot, which may turn out
boring, if the events are simply narrated
as they happen one after one.
Flashbacks
are a very powerful tool for writers
who want to take control on the way their readers get to learn about the story
facts. They become just like pieces of a
puzzle. At the beginning you have some information, which seems unrelated
to each other, just like different sections of a puzzle. Then, at some point,
you find a kind of bridge between two sections and toward the end all pieces perfectly match giving you the
whole picture of the story. I find this to be a very entertaining way to get to experience a story, both for the
reader and for the writer.
There isn’t
only a way to weave the different timelines in a plot, but the most common one
occurs when you have two of them (present
and past time) and there are alternated
chapter by chapter or scene by scene. At the beginning they seem really
different, until the reader spot the first connection.
As I said
in my previous post, I’m currently reading “Fallen Dragon” by Peter F. Hamilton (I’m almost done with
it). This is an excellent example of this use of flashbacks. Hamilton alternates chapter set in the
present time with others which are referred to the past.
In the
first one (present), Lawrence, the protagonist, is busy in a very difficult
asset realization campaign (a kind of piracy) in a planet called Thallspring.
The second one (past), instead, shows the reader how he got there, starting
when he was just a kid. Both timelines have the same space and value in the stories, there isn’t one which is
less important or includes less action. Both of them give us important
information until, in the end (I suppose), they merge to the conclusion of the
story.
I’ve seen
something like that also in the Void
Trilogy of Hamilton , and I tend to think he likes very much using
flashbacks this way. While thinking back at the story itself, I must admit that
if it were been told in a more linear
way (we are talking about an 800-page story), it wouldn’t be so much appealing. That’s because most events from
the past are actually quite isolated
self-concluding episodes, which would get the reader to a halt at the end
of them. On the contrary, putting them as a pause in the exciting action of the present time give them more
value, because from time to time they
offer new clues, which helps the understanding of the main plot. At the
same time they increase the expectation
about what would happen next.
But there
are other ways to use flashbacks.
Actually I found myself thinking about Hamilton ’s books, when I realize that the
reason I like them so much is that a love to use a very similar trick in my own
novels.
They are
not as long and complicated, scenes are much faster than in his books, but all
the same I like to start the story in
media res and keep at least two timelines. But I go further, because I’m less equilibrated in showing past and present;
I actually tend to be a bit more chaotic (but not too much) for making things
even more fun.
Though
there is a main timeline, I like to get back
to different points of the past based on the event itself, which is
narrated, instead of its position in time, using a way of showing a story that
reminds me the way memory works,
i.e. by associations. I find this kind of approach a bit less constructed and a
bit more natural. What I yearn for is to take the reader by their hand and fly
with them in the story as smoothly as
possible, letting the few interruptions be put in very strategic points of
the plot, those which cinema calls plot
points, thus allowing them to be emphasised.
Anyway,
whatever the way they are used, jumps in
time are a great way to forcing a
story to appear as we want without changing the events of which it is made
of.
And what’s your opinion about the use of
flashbacks? How often do you use them in your writing? How do you like them in
the books you read?
I think that flashbacks and flashforwards can work for some novels, but not for others.
ReplyDeleteIn "A Deal with a Stranger" flashbacks couldn't work, because the story starts from a specific event, which takes place in the present, and it evolves from there. Each new chapter and event is connected, time-wise, to the previous ones.
As a reader I like flashbacks, especially if used in the way you describe: by memory associations.
The author has to be really skilled at using flashbacks effectively though, because a continuous jumping backwards and forwards can confuse the reader. The author needs to remember that the reader doesn't have the full picture yet, doesn't know how that piece of a puzzle fits with the rest. So, it's tricky to create the balance between a gripping plot, where the reader doesn't know what's going to happen next but he/she's looking forward to it, and the confusion of not having a clue anymore of what's going on in the story, because present and past have lost their connection.
Flashbacks just like any other literary trick work only if they help moving the plot. I mean, you don't just tell something happened in the past, if it's not an important information to better understand a character, for instance, or a particular event in the present.
ReplyDeleteSome stories just don't need them.
But it's also true that you can choose to narrate a story, any story, in a different time order, since the beginning. Just like in a movie (e.g. "Pulp fiction") you can "edit" (in the cinema meaning) the scenes in an order which follows a different logic than time.
One of these logics is memory associations. This is the one used in the famous stream of consciuousness, which is actually a kinda extreme use of this tool.
But there can be others depending on the story. For instance you can use a narrator, who can decide to tell the story in whatever order they like, even backwards! It works well when the purpose of the story is not to know how it ends in the first place.
But there are also authors who write the story in the right order then mix the scenes to create a certain pathos. :)
Anyway, whatever you decide to do, you can have a lot of fun in arranging time when writing your book. This makes you feel quite powerful. ;)